Free AI Citation Generator One Generator, Six Style Rulebooks
This AI citation generator formats a correct citation for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Copilot or any other AI tool in APA 7, MLA 9, Chicago 18, Harvard, IEEE and Vancouver. Select the tool, enter the version, date and prompt, and it returns a reference entry together with every in-text form, built on the position each style manual has taken on generative AI. Ten model families load with their details preset; anything else takes only a few extra keystrokes.
APA now cites the conversation, so it wants the chat's own title and a share link to it. The model name is in the product's model picker. The prompt is what MLA, Chicago and Harvard build their entries around.
84,000+
International Researchers
Average Rating
Trusted by researchers publishing in
Citing an AI conversation in three moves
Record the exact model version
Check the model picker or the settings panel inside your AI tool and write down the version string you were served. These systems are updated on a scale of weeks, so the version is what lets a reader place the exchange, in the way an edition number places a book.
Note the date and what you asked
Two details decide the shape of the entry: the day the text was produced and the wording of your prompt. MLA and Chicago build the citation around the prompt, and all six styles record the date somewhere in the entry.
Select a style and take the entry
APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, IEEE and Vancouver are each available. Every one copies with its italics preserved and arrives with the in-text forms, along with the disclosure or note wording that style requires.
What sets this AI citation generator apart
Guidance the style bodies actually published
APA, MLA and Chicago each issued genuine guidance on citing generative AI, and this generator follows all three to the letter: APA's company-as-author pattern, MLA's prompt-as-title structure, Chicago's notes-only rule.
Ten model families ready to go
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Meta AI, Copilot, Grok, DeepSeek, Le Chat, Perplexity and Qwen load with their company name and URL already filled in, so only the version, date and prompt need entering.
Each style's own shape kept
Chicago drops the bibliography entry, MLA drops the author, Harvard asks for an appendix, IEEE asks for a disclosure line. The output changes structure per style instead of forcing one template across six rulebooks.
Formatting that survives the paste
Copying carries a rich-text and a plain-text version together, so a model's italicized title lands correctly in Microsoft Word or Google Docs.
How APA, MLA and Chicago actually treat an AI source
For the first year after generative AI tools reached students and researchers, no style manual had ruled on how to cite one, so writers improvised. Three manuals then took positions, and the positions do not match. APA assigns the output to the company behind the model: the developer sits in the author slot, the model name is italicized as the title, and the version goes in parentheses. MLA declines to call an AI system an author at all, so its entry is built around the prompt, with the tool named as the container the prompt appeared in. Chicago sorts the whole exchange under personal communication: a footnote or an in-text mention carries the citation, and the bibliography stays empty.
Every one of the three patterns leans on two details a writer can lose track of quickly: exactly which version answered, and on what date. A prompt run today and the same prompt run after the next model update can return different text, so the version field carries weight a book's edition rarely has to. That is also why the guidance sends readers to the tool's general web address rather than a link to one conversation, and why keeping a full transcript in an appendix is the fallback all three manuals point toward.
On one point, academic publishing has stopped arguing: no AI system is listed as an author. The ICMJE and COPE both hold that authorship requires accountability for the work, something no model can take on, and publishers including Nature and Science apply the same rule. What follows is two separate obligations rather than one: citing AI output anywhere it appears in the text, and disclosing AI assistance wherever a journal or department asks for that statement, typically in the methods section or the acknowledgments.
A related habit belongs beside the citation itself. Any source a model recommends needs its own check against a real database before it joins a reference list, since these systems produce convincing references that turn out not to exist. The AI citation checker runs that check on an entire pasted list at once, and the main citation generator builds verified entries straight from Crossref. Once the sources are settled, the TextPulse humanizer is what keeps the surrounding prose from reading like the model wrote that part too.
Every field in an AI citation, labeled
A single ChatGPT exchange broken into its parts across six styles. Point at any colored segment of the reference entry or an in-text form to see what that piece is and which rule put it there.
OpenAI. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. ChatGPT-5. chatgpt.com/share/...
APA's current pattern, published 9 September 2025, which cites the conversation rather than the tool. The earlier format, with the product as the title and a version in parentheses, is now marked archival on APA's own site. Alphabetize under the company's name.
(OpenAI, 2026)
OpenAI (2026)...
When prompted, ChatGPT generated... (OpenAI, 2026)
APA recommends describing the prompt in the text or method section; a full transcript can go in an appendix.
(OpenAI, 2026)
AI output has no page numbers, so no p. locator is possible; make clear in the sentence that the words are the model's.
Hover any coloured part for what it is and the rule behind it.
Six style manuals, six different answers
Four distinct positions produce seven finished formats. Here is the reasoning behind each one, and what the generator does with it.
APA hands authorship to the company
OpenAI, Anthropic or Google sits in the author position, credited with the output the algorithm produced. The model name is italicized as the title, the version sits in parentheses, and a bracketed label states the source type.
MLA builds the entry around the prompt
MLA will not name an AI system as an author, so the prompt you typed, in quotation marks, becomes the title that opens the entry, with the tool as the italicized container and a shortened prompt carrying the in-text citation.
Chicago keeps it to a note
Chicago classes an AI exchange as personal communication: a numbered footnote records the model, the prompt, the company and the full date, and neither Chicago system sends any of it to the bibliography.
Harvard treats it as correspondence
Cite Them Right files generative AI under personal communication, on the reasoning that a reader cannot retrieve the exchange. The developer and tool serve as originator, and the full transcript is recommended for an appendix.
IEEE asks for a disclosure
With no dedicated IEEE template, a software citation pattern fills the gap, but what IEEE actually requires is separate: a statement in the acknowledgments declaring that AI-generated content was used.
Vancouver follows ICMJE
Medical journals apply the ICMJE position directly: AI use goes in the methods or acknowledgments, authorship is not on the table, and the reference entry itself borrows the NLM pattern for software.
Ten model families, ready without setup
Every preset carries the developer's real name and web address. Shown here in APA 7; the generator renders each one in all six other styles too.
ChatGPT
OpenAI
OpenAI. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. ChatGPT-5. https://chatgpt.com/
Claude
Anthropic
Anthropic. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Claude Sonnet 4.5. https://claude.ai/
Gemini
Google. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Gemini 2.5 Pro. https://gemini.google.com/
Meta AI
Meta
Meta. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Llama 4. https://www.meta.ai/
Copilot
Microsoft
Microsoft. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Copilot GPT-5. https://copilot.microsoft.com/
Grok
xAI
xAI. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Grok 4. https://grok.com/
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
DeepSeek. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. DeepSeek-V3. https://chat.deepseek.com/
Le Chat
Mistral AI
Mistral AI. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Mistral Large. https://chat.mistral.ai/
Perplexity
Perplexity AI
Perplexity AI. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Perplexity Sonar. https://www.perplexity.ai/
Qwen
Alibaba Cloud
Alibaba Cloud. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Qwen3. https://chat.qwen.ai/
APA 7 is shown here; the generator produces all seven outputs for every model listed. Each version string is a current example, so substitute the one you were served.
The same exchange, every supported style
A single ChatGPT conversation formatted for every style included here. Notice where the prompt appears, where it disappears, and which styles keep AI out of the reference list altogether.
APA (7th edition)
Reference list entry
OpenAI. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. ChatGPT-5. https://chatgpt.com/
MLA (9th edition)
Works Cited entry
"Explain the difference between correlation and causation for a first-year statistics student" prompt. ChatGPT, ChatGPT-5, OpenAI, 14 July 2026, chatgpt.com.
Chicago (notes and bibliography)
Footnote (Chicago cites AI in notes only)
ChatGPT, response to "Explain the difference between correlation and causation for a first-year statistics student," OpenAI, 14 July 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
In-text citation (no reference list entry)
(ChatGPT, 14 July 2026)
Harvard (Cite Them Right)
Reference list entry
OpenAI ChatGPT (2026) ChatGPT response to prompt 'Explain the difference between correlation and causation for a first-year statistics student', 14 July.
IEEE
Reference list entry
[1] OpenAI, ChatGPT (ChatGPT-5) [Large language model], 2026. [Online]. Available: https://chatgpt.com/ (accessed 14 July 2026).
Vancouver
Reference list entry
1. ChatGPT (ChatGPT-5) [Large language model]. OpenAI; 2026 [cited 14 July 2026]. Available from: https://chatgpt.com/
The seven entries above are generator output. Replace the prompt and the dates with the details of the conversation you are citing.
Four ways this generator gets used
Students
Citing AI use when it is permitted, in the exact form a style manual specifies rather than an improvised guess.
Researchers and academics
Meeting a journal's disclosure requirement and its citation requirement from the same reference entry.
AI-assisted writers
Keeping a visible line between what a model wrote, what it suggested, and what still needs verifying.
Instructors and integrity officers
One page that shows a class how APA, MLA and Chicago each want AI cited, disagreements included.
The AI source is cited correctly.
The rest of the draft still needs its own pass.
The TextPulse humanizer works through phrasing and rhythm across a full draft while every citation, including the AI ones, stays exactly in place. Tracked changes cover each edit, and a free demo is included.