免费 AI 引用生成器 一个生成器，六套格式规范
此 AI 引用生成器可为 ChatGPT、Claude、Gemini、Copilot 或任何其他 AI 工具生成符合 APA 7、MLA 9、Chicago 18、Harvard、IEEE 和 Vancouver 的正确引文。选择工具，输入版本、日期和提示词，它会返回参考文献条目以及所有文内引用形式，依据的是各格式手册对生成式 AI 所采取的立场。十个模型家族已预设其详细信息，其他任何工具只需再输入少量字符。
APA 现在引用的是对话，因此它需要聊天本身的标题以及指向该标题的分享链接。模型名称位于产品的模型选择器中。提示词是 MLA、Chicago 和 Harvard 构建其条目的基础。
84,000+
国际研究人员
平均评分
受到发表在以下期刊中的研究人员信赖
三步引用 AI 对话
记录准确的模型版本
查看 AI 工具中的模型选择器或设置面板，记下系统提供给你的版本字符串。这些系统通常按周更新，因此版本号能让读者定位这次交互，就像版次能定位一本书。
记下日期和你的提问
条目的形式由两个细节决定，文本生成日期和提示词措辞。MLA 和 Chicago 以提示词为引文核心，六种格式都会在条目中的某处记录日期。
选择一种格式并获取条目
APA、MLA、Chicago、Harvard、IEEE 和 Vancouver 均可使用。每一种都会保留其斜体格式，并附带文内引用形式，以及该格式所要求的披露或注释措辞。
此 AI 引用生成器的独特之处
格式机构实际发布的指引
APA、MLA 和 Chicago 都已发布关于引用生成式 AI 的正式指引，而本生成器严格遵循三者：APA 的公司作为作者模式，MLA 的以提示词为标题结构，Chicago 的仅注释规则。
十个模型家族可直接使用
ChatGPT、Claude、Gemini、Meta AI、Copilot、Grok、DeepSeek、Le Chat、Perplexity 和 Qwen 已预填公司名称和 URL，因此只需输入版本、日期和提示词。
保留各格式自身的结构
Chicago 不包含参考文献条目，MLA 不写作者，Harvard 要求附录，IEEE 要求披露行。输出会按格式改变结构，而不是用同一模板套用六套规则。
可直接粘贴的格式
复制时会同时保留富文本和纯文本版本，因此模型的斜体标题可在 Microsoft Word 或 Google Docs 中正确显示。
APA、MLA 和 Chicago 实际如何处理 AI 来源
在生成式 AI 工具进入学生和研究者视野后的第一年里，没有任何格式手册规定应如何引用它，因此作者只能自行处理。随后三种手册分别给出了立场，而且这些立场并不一致。APA 将输出归于模型背后的公司，开发者位于作者栏，模型名称以斜体作为标题，版本置于括号中。MLA 不将 AI 系统视为作者，因此其条目以提示词为核心，工具名称作为提示词所处的容器。Chicago 将整个交互归入个人通信，脚注或文内提及承担引文功能，而参考文献表保持空白。
这三种模式都依赖于两个作者很容易很快忽略的细节, 即究竟是哪个版本给出了回答, 以及在什么日期。今天运行一次提示词, 在下一次模型更新后用同一提示词再运行, 可能会返回不同文本, 因此版本字段的重要性, 往往是书籍版次才会有的。也正因如此, 指南会引导读者前往工具的通用网页地址, 而不是某一段对话的链接, 也正因如此, 将完整记录附在附录中, 才是三份手册都指向的备选做法。
在一点上, 学术出版已经不再争论, 任何 AI 系统都不会被列为作者。ICMJE 和 COPE 都认为, 作者身份要求对工作承担责任, 这是任何模型都无法承担的, 包括 Nature 和 Science 在内的出版机构也采用同样规则。由此产生的是两项彼此独立的义务, 而不是一项, 即在文本中任何出现 AI 输出的地方加以引用, 并在期刊或院系要求作出说明的地方披露 AI 辅助, 通常是在方法部分或致谢部分。
与引用本身并列的, 还有一个相关习惯。模型推荐的任何来源, 在进入参考文献表之前, 都需要先在真实数据库中核查, 因为这些系统会生成看似可信、却实际上并不存在的参考文献。AI citation checker 会一次性对整份粘贴的列表执行这项核查, 而 main citation generator 则直接从 Crossref 生成经过核实的条目。一旦来源确定, TextPulse humanizer 的作用就是让周围的行文不至于读起来像那一部分也是模型写的。
Every field in an AI citation, labeled
A single ChatGPT exchange broken into its parts across six styles. Point at any colored segment of the reference entry or an in-text form to see what that piece is and which rule put it there.
OpenAI. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. ChatGPT-5. chatgpt.com/share/...
APA's current pattern, published 9 September 2025, which cites the conversation rather than the tool. The earlier format, with the product as the title and a version in parentheses, is now marked archival on APA's own site. Alphabetize under the company's name.
(OpenAI, 2026)
OpenAI (2026)...
When prompted, ChatGPT generated... (OpenAI, 2026)
APA recommends describing the prompt in the text or method section; a full transcript can go in an appendix.
(OpenAI, 2026)
AI output has no page numbers, so no p. locator is possible; make clear in the sentence that the words are the model's.
Hover any coloured part for what it is and the rule behind it.
Six style manuals, six different answers
Four distinct positions produce seven finished formats. Here is the reasoning behind each one, and what the generator does with it.
APA hands authorship to the company
OpenAI, Anthropic or Google sits in the author position, credited with the output the algorithm produced. The model name is italicized as the title, the version sits in parentheses, and a bracketed label states the source type.
MLA builds the entry around the prompt
MLA will not name an AI system as an author, so the prompt you typed, in quotation marks, becomes the title that opens the entry, with the tool as the italicized container and a shortened prompt carrying the in-text citation.
Chicago keeps it to a note
Chicago classes an AI exchange as personal communication: a numbered footnote records the model, the prompt, the company and the full date, and neither Chicago system sends any of it to the bibliography.
Harvard treats it as correspondence
Cite Them Right files generative AI under personal communication, on the reasoning that a reader cannot retrieve the exchange. The developer and tool serve as originator, and the full transcript is recommended for an appendix.
IEEE asks for a disclosure
With no dedicated IEEE template, a software citation pattern fills the gap, but what IEEE actually requires is separate: a statement in the acknowledgments declaring that AI-generated content was used.
Vancouver follows ICMJE
Medical journals apply the ICMJE position directly: AI use goes in the methods or acknowledgments, authorship is not on the table, and the reference entry itself borrows the NLM pattern for software.
Ten model families, ready without setup
Every preset carries the developer's real name and web address. Shown here in APA 7; the generator renders each one in all six other styles too.
ChatGPT
OpenAI
OpenAI. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. ChatGPT-5. https://chatgpt.com/
Claude
Anthropic
Anthropic. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Claude Sonnet 4.5. https://claude.ai/
Gemini
Google. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Gemini 2.5 Pro. https://gemini.google.com/
Meta AI
Meta
Meta. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Llama 4. https://www.meta.ai/
Copilot
Microsoft
Microsoft. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Copilot GPT-5. https://copilot.microsoft.com/
Grok
xAI
xAI. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Grok 4. https://grok.com/
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
DeepSeek. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. DeepSeek-V3. https://chat.deepseek.com/
Le Chat
Mistral AI
Mistral AI. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Mistral Large. https://chat.mistral.ai/
Perplexity
Perplexity AI
Perplexity AI. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Perplexity Sonar. https://www.perplexity.ai/
Qwen
Alibaba Cloud
Alibaba Cloud. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. Qwen3. https://chat.qwen.ai/
APA 7 is shown here; the generator produces all seven outputs for every model listed. Each version string is a current example, so substitute the one you were served.
The same exchange, every supported style
A single ChatGPT conversation formatted for every style included here. Notice where the prompt appears, where it disappears, and which styles keep AI out of the reference list altogether.
APA (7th edition)
Reference list entry
OpenAI. (2026, July 14). Correlation and causation explained [Generative AI chat]. ChatGPT-5. https://chatgpt.com/
MLA (9th edition)
Works Cited entry
"Explain the difference between correlation and causation for a first-year statistics student" prompt. ChatGPT, ChatGPT-5, OpenAI, 14 July 2026, chatgpt.com.
Chicago (notes and bibliography)
Footnote (Chicago cites AI in notes only)
ChatGPT, response to "Explain the difference between correlation and causation for a first-year statistics student," OpenAI, 14 July 2026.
Chicago (author-date)
In-text citation (no reference list entry)
(ChatGPT, 14 July 2026)
Harvard (Cite Them Right)
Reference list entry
OpenAI ChatGPT (2026) ChatGPT response to prompt 'Explain the difference between correlation and causation for a first-year statistics student', 14 July.
IEEE
Reference list entry
[1] OpenAI, ChatGPT (ChatGPT-5) [Large language model], 2026. [Online]. Available: https://chatgpt.com/ (accessed 14 July 2026).
Vancouver
Reference list entry
1. ChatGPT (ChatGPT-5) [Large language model]. OpenAI; 2026 [cited 14 July 2026]. Available from: https://chatgpt.com/
The seven entries above are generator output. Replace the prompt and the dates with the details of the conversation you are citing.
此生成器的四种用途
学生
在允许使用 AI 时, 按照样式手册规定的准确形式引用, 而不是凭空猜测。
研究人员和学者
用同一条参考文献条目同时满足期刊的披露要求和引用要求。
AI 辅助写作者
清楚区分模型写了什么, 它建议了什么, 以及什么仍需核实。
教师和学术诚信负责人
一个页面, 展示班级如何分别按 APA、MLA 和 Chicago 引用 AI, 包括其中的分歧。
AI 来源已正确引用。
其余草稿仍需要单独处理。
TextPulse humanizer 通过对整篇草稿的措辞和节奏进行处理来工作，同时每一处引文，包括 AI 引文，都保持原位不变。修订痕迹会覆盖每一处编辑，并包含一个免费演示。